International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 Routing Protocols on Wired, Wireless and Hybrid Networks

Author NameAuthor Details

Sonal Telang Chandel, Sanjay Sharma

Sonal Telang Chandel[1]

Sanjay Sharma[2]

[1]Department of Computer Applications, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.

[2]Department of Computer Applications, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India.

Abstract

A routing protocol is used to determine the optimal path to forward the packets from source to destination. A separate set of protocols is designed for IPv4 & IPv6 network such as RIP, OSPF-v2, RIPng, OSPF-v3, and AODV. IPv4 is replaced by IPv6 (next generation internet protocol), but both the protocols are not suitable for each other, due to this they need to coexist for a long time. In this paper, the performance is evaluated for different routing protocols for IPv4 and IPv6 over wired, wireless and the hybrid network. Simulations are carried out on EXata/Cyber 2.1 Simulator/Emulator. The performance of routing protocols is measured on the basis of throughput, jitter, end-to-end delay and packet delivery ratio (PDR). By the simulation, on the basis of throughput and PDR performance of AODV (IPv4) is very good as compared with other routing protocols. It has been observed that due to the size of the IPv6 header, which is larger than IPv4 header the performance of routing protocols downgrades.

Index Terms

Routing Protocols

RIP-v2

RIPng

OSPF-v2

OSPF-v3

AODV

Reference

  1. 1.
    M.Tufail(2006)“IPv6-An opportunity for new service and network features", International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS), Silicon Valley, USA,IEEE
  2. 2.
    S.Deering,R.Hinden (1998), “Request for Comments:2460-IPv6 Specifications”
  3. 3.
    D.R Bhandra, C.A. Joshi,NikitaP.Vyas (2015) “Packet Loss Probability in Wireless Networks:A Survey", International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, IEEE, pp. 1348-1354
  4. 4.
    K. Majumdar,S.KSarkar(2009), “ Performance Analysis of AODV and DSR Routing Protocols in Hybrid Network Scenario, IEEE
  5. 5.
    P. Mittal, S. Batra, Dr. C.K Nagpal, “Implementation of a Novel Protocol for Coordination of nodes in MANET” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Volume 2, Issue 2, March – April (2015)
  6. 6.
    M.Papadopoulos,G. Skourletopoulos, (2014)“Performance Analysis of Reactive Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Network", IEEE
  7. 7.
    D. Chauhan and S.Sharma (2014) “Performance Evaluation of Different Routing Protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 Networks on the basis of Packet Sizes", International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology, pp. 1072-1078
  8. 8.
    S.Zafar, H.Tariq,K.Manzoor, “Throughput and Delay Analysis of AODV, DSDV and DSR Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA) Volume 3, Issue 2, March – April (2016)
  9. 9.
    S. Taneja and A. Kush (2010) “A Survey of routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks, International Journal. Innov. Manag. Technology., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 279-285
  10. 10.
    Y. Navaneeth Krishnan, Dr. Shobha G(2013), “ Performance Analysis of OSPF and EIGRP Routing Protocols for Greener Internetworking”, International Conference on Green High Computing, IEEE
  11. 11.
    A. Aggarwal, S. Gandhi, and N. Chaubey (2011) “Performance analysis of AODV, DSDV and DSR in MANETs" , International Journal Distrib. Parallel Syst. IJDPS, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 167-177
  12. 12.
    EXata/Cyber 1.1 User's Guide," Scalable Network Technologies", http://www.scalable-networks.com
  13. 13.
    Sanjeev Sharma and Sanjay Sharma (2014) “IPv4 vs IPv6 QoS: A challenge in MANET" International Journal of Science and Applied Information Technology, Vol 3,No 4, pp.7-11
  14. 14.
    G. Malkin (1998),“Request for Comments:2453: Routing Information Protocol-v2”
  15. 15.
    G .Malkin, Xylogics,RMinnear (2006) “Request for Comments:2080-RIPng for IPv6”
  16. 16.
    J. Moy (1998), “Request for Comments: 2328, OSPF version2”
  17. 17.
    R.Coltun, D. Ferguson, J. Moy,A. Lindem (2008), “Request for Comments:5340-OSPF for IPv6”
  18. 18.
    C. Perkins, S.Das, E. Belding –Royer (2003),“Request for Comments:3561-AODV Routing”
SCOPUS
SCImago Journal & Country Rank