International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

A Technique for Efficiently Controlling Centralized Data Congestion in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Author NameAuthor Details

Leila Zolfagharipour, Mohammed Hayder Kadhim

Leila Zolfagharipour[1]

Mohammed Hayder Kadhim[2]

[1]Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

[2]Department of Information Technology, Jabir Ibn Hayyan University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Najaf, Iraq

Abstract

Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) belong to a distinct classification of wireless ad hoc networks. These networks are a subset of MANET networks used to communicate in ITS systems. Like MANET, VANETs do not have a specific structure, and the network nodes represent moving vehicles. The driver's decision, high speed, and continuous movement of cars have imposed unique characteristics on these networks. There are also new challenges, such as scalability, data routing, information broadcasting, QoS, and security. The rapid velocity of vehicles results in a significant frequency of VANET topology alterations. At the same time, the slow acceleration of cars can result in a substantial traffic concentration and an elevated likelihood of data collisions, leading to congestion. This paper proposes a new strategy for data congestion control. Upon identifying the network congestion, the proposed method resolves the congestion by emphasizing the minimal rate of the loss of packets (the quantity of dropped packets) by solving the optimization problem. In fact, after modelling the congestion and solving the problem, the data transmission rate is determined to minimize packet loss. The proposed method is compared with prominent data congestion control methods in networks such as CSMA/CA to evaluate the performance. The evaluation parameters include the network service quality, including the number of lost packets, throughput, and delay. The evaluation results indicate improvement in the network.

Index Terms

Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

Congestion Control

Optimization

VANET

MANET Networks

CSMA/CA

Reference

  1. 1.
    VN. Ahamed, T. Nadu, K. Sivaraman, “Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Assisted Clustering Nodular Framework for Optimal Packet Routing and Scaling,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 82-95, 2019.
  2. 2.
    L. Zolfagharipour, MH. Kadhim, TH. Mandeel, “Enhance the Security of Access to IoT-based Equipment in Fog,” Al-Sadiq International Conference on Communication and Information Technology (AICCIT), pp. 142-146, 2023.
  3. 3.
    HA. Ahmed, D. Cheelu, “A Novel Dynamic Message Time Synchronization Protocol for Real Time Data Exchange in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 213-231, 2024.
  4. 4.
    M. Talau, TA. Herek, M. Fonseca, EC. Wille, “The Early Window Tailoring method improves TCP performance over a common IoT scenario,” Computer Networks, Vol. 190, Article 109875, 2023.
  5. 5.
    N. Taherkhani, S. Pierre, “Centralized and localized data congestion control strategy for vehicular ad hoc networks using a machine learning clustering algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 3275-3285, 2016.
  6. 6.
    S. Sharma, M. Panjeta, “Optimization transmits rate-based decentralized congestion control schemes in vehicular ad hoc networks,” AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2555, No. 1, pp. 123-135, 2022.
  7. 7.
    S. Jayachandran, A. Jaekel, “Adaptive Data Rate Based Congestion Control in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET),” International Conference on Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 144-157, 2021.
  8. 8.
    E.C. Dapaah, P. Memarmoshrefi, D. Hogrefe, “Transmission power-control certificate omission in vehicular ad hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks: 12th EAI International Conference, pp. 164-176, 2021.
  9. 9.
    P. Chandrasekharan, “Transmission Power Based Congestion Control Using Q-Learning Algorithm in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET),” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Windsor (Canada), 2023.
  10. 10.
    A. Akinwale, JE. Efiong, E. Olajubu, G. Aderounmu, “A Torpor-based Enhanced Security Model for CSMA/CA Protocol in Wireless Networks,” Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 43-55, 2024.
  11. 11.
    O. Abedi, A. Pourhasani, “Prioritized multi-channel MAC protocol in ad hoc networks using a TDMA/CSMA approach,” Wireless Networks, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 2629-2640, 2021.
  12. 12.
    N. Ismail, MA. Hossain, RM. Noor, AWA. Wahab, “Enhanced Congestion Control Model Based on Message Prioritization and Scheduling Mechanism in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I),” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2312, No. 1, p. 012087, 2022.
  13. 13.
    F. Naeimipoor, “An emergency vehicle prioritization protocol for VANET based on QoS,” Doctoral Dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa, 2022.
  14. 14.
    A. Ali, M. Vadivel, “Energy efficient congestion control in wireless sensor networks using meta-heuristic algorithms,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 448-473, 2023.
  15. 15.
    KK. Patil, T. Senthil Kumaran, AY. Prasad, “Improved Congestion Control in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Clustering with a Metaheuristic Approach,” Journal of Interconnection Networks, Vol. 23, No. 2, p. 2250005, 2023.
  16. 16.
    JA. Guerrero-Ibáñez, C. Flores-Cortés, S. Zeadally, “Vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs): architecture, protocols, and applications,” Next-Generation Wireless Technologies: 4G and Beyond, pp. 49-70, 2013.
  17. 17.
    MR. Sattari, RM. Noor, S. Ghahremani, “Dynamic congestion control algorithm for vehicular ad hoc networks,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 95-108, 2013.
  18. 18.
    S. Zeadally, R. Hunt, YS. Chen, A. Irwin, A. Hassan, “Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges,” Telecommunication Systems, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 217-241, 2012.
  19. 19.
    Y. Liu, F. Dion, S. Biswas, “Dedicated short-range wireless communications for intelligent transportation system applications: State of the art,” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1910, No. 1, pp. 29-37, 2005.
  20. 20.
    Y. Qian, N. Moayeri, “Design of secure and application-oriented VANETs,” VTC Spring 2008-IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 2794-2799, 2008.
  21. 21.
    AA. Rezaee, MH. Yaghmaee, AM. Rahmani, AH. Mohajerzadeh, “HOCA: Healthcare-aware optimized congestion avoidance and control protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 216-228, 2014.
  22. 22.
    GB. Dantzig, A. Orden, P. Wolfe, “The generalized simplex method for minimizing a linear form under linear inequality restraints,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 183-195, 1955.
  23. 23.
    F. Kaisser, C. Gransart, M. Berbineau, “Simulations of vanet scenarios with opnet and sumo,” Communication Technologies for Vehicles: 4th International Workshop, Nets4Cars/Nets4Trains, pp. 103-112, 2012.
  24. 24.
    Z. Lu, H. Yang, “Unlocking the Power of OPNET modeller,” Cambridge University Press, 2012.