International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Development and Evaluation of RSSI and AOA-Based Localization Methods Utilizing the MVO Algorithm for UWSNs

Author NameAuthor Details

Seema Rani, Anju

Seema Rani[1]

Anju[2]

[1]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India.

[2]Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India.

Abstract

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) play an essential role in aquatic environment monitoring, supporting applications such as oceanographic data collection, underwater resource management and disaster prevention. However, accurate localization in underwater remains a significant challenge due to the unique features of underwater environments, including the reliance on acoustic communication, mobility of sensor nodes and the complexity of three-dimensional topology. Traditional localization techniques, like Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) and Angle of Arrival (AOA) methods, suffer from several limitations, including inaccuracies due to time-varying sound speeds affected by salinity, temperature, and pressure. Additionally, they often exhibit high energy consumption, slow convergence, and poor adaptability to dynamic underwater environment. Existing optimization-based localization approaches, face trade-offs between exploration and exploitation, limiting their effectiveness in achieving optimal position estimates. The primary challenge in UWSN localization is achieving high accuracy while minimizing energy consumption and computational complexity. Many existing methods struggle with adaptability in dynamic underwater conditions, where sensor nodes are mobile and environmental factors significantly affect signal propagation. There is a need for an advanced localization approach that can effectively balance accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in complex underwater environments. This paper presents a novel localization approach utilizing the Multi-Verse Optimization (MVO) algorithm, a physics-inspired metaheuristic technique. MVO enhances RSSI and AOA-based localization by maintaining a balance between exploration and exploitation, leading to improved position estimation. Through extensive simulations, we evaluate performance of MVO in terms of localization accuracy, convergence speed, energy efficiency and resilience to anchor node distribution variations. The results demonstrate that MVO significantly outperforms conventional methods by achieving higher localization accuracy while reducing computational overhead. While AOA-based localization is more precise under ideal conditions, RSSI-based methods offer lower complexity, making them suitable for resource-constrained deployments. By overcoming key limitations such as sensitivity to environmental fluctuations and high computational costs, this work establishes MVO as a robust and efficient localization solution for UWSNs operating in challenging underwater environments.

Index Terms

UWSNs

Positioning

RSSI

AOA

MVO Algorithm

Localization Accuracy

Energy Usage

Coverage

Delivery Rates

Reference

  1. 1.
    Dass, A. K., Das, S., Pattnaik, S. R., & Nayak, M. (2022). Node localization in UWSN using AUV with anchor-free optimal path planning model. Journal Of Harbin Institute of Technology, 54(10), 2022.
  2. 2.
    Parwekar, P., & Rodda, S. (2018). Localization of Sensors by Base Station in Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, Vol. 77, February 2018, pp. 83-86.
  3. 3.
    Zhang, S., Li, J., He, B., & Chen, J. (2016). LSDV-Hop: Least Squares Based DV-Hop Localization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Commun., 11(3), 243-248.
  4. 4.
    Yashwanth, N., & Sujatha, B. R. (2019). Node localization performance for UWSN topologies. J. Commun., 14(9), 839-844.
  5. 5.
    Liouane, O., Femmam, S., Bakir, T., & Abdelali, A. B. (2021). Improved Two Hidden Layers Extreme Learning Machines for Node Localization in Range Free Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Commun., 16(12), 528-534.
  6. 6.
    Mei, X., Wu, H., Saeed, N., Ma, T., Xian, J., & Chen, Y. (2020). An Absorption Mitigation Technique for Received Signal Strength-Based Target Localization In Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 20(17), 4698.
  7. 7.
    Li, Y., Liu, M., Zhang, S., Zheng, R., Lan, J., & Dong, S. (2022). Particle system-based ordinary nodes localization with delay compensation in UWSNs. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(7), 7157-7168.
  8. 8.
    Ullah, I., Liu, Y., Su, X., & Kim, P. (2019). Efficient and accurate target localization in underwater environment. IEEE Access, 7, 101415-101426.
  9. 9.
    Erol-Kantarci, M., Mouftah, H. T., & Oktug, S. (2011). A survey of architectures and localization techniques for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 13(3), 487-502.
  10. 10.
    Su, X., Ullah, I., Liu, X., & Choi, D. (2020). A review of underwater localization techniques, algorithms, and challenges. Journal of Sensors, 2020(1), 6403161.
  11. 11.
    Niculescu, D., & Nath, B. (2003). DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 22, 267-280.
  12. 12.
    Rabaey, C. S. J., & Langendoen, K. (2002, June). Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In USENIX technical annual conference (pp. 317-327).
  13. 13.
    Wong, S. Y., Lim, J. G., Rao, S. V., & Seah, W. K. (2005, May). Multihop localization with density and path length awareness in non-uniform wireless sensor networks. In 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 2551-2555). IEEE.
  14. 14.
    Chandrasekhar, V., & Seah, W. (2006, May). An area localization scheme for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2006-Asia Pacific (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
  15. 15.
    He, T., Huang, C., Blum, B. M., Stankovic, J. A., & Abdelzaher, T. (2003, September). Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th annual International Conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 81-95).
  16. 16.
    Chen, H., Huang, P., Martins, M., So, H. C., & Sezaki, K. (2008, October). Novel centroid localization algorithm for three-dimensional wireless sensor networks. In 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  17. 17.
    Chang, S., Li, Y., He, Y., & Wang, H. (2018). Target localization in underwater acoustic sensor networks using RSS measurements. Applied Sciences, 8(2), 225.
  18. 18.
    Zhou, R., Chen, J., Tan, W., & Cai, C. (2022). Sensor selection for optimal target localization with 3-D angle of arrival estimation in underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), 245.
  19. 19.
    Tomic, S., Beko, M., & Tuba, M. (2019). A linear estimator for network localization using integrated RSS and AOA measurements. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 26(3), 405-409.
  20. 20.
    Nuo, W., Qiang, G. U. O., Ming-Lei, S. H. U., Jia-liang, L. Ü., & Ming, Y. A. N. G. (2012). Three-dimensional localization algorithm of wireless sensor networks base on particle swarm optimization. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 19, 7-12.
  21. 21.
    Shakila, R., & Paramasivan, B. (2021). An improved range based localization using whale optimization algorithm in underwater wireless sensor network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 6479-6489.
  22. 22.
    Hu, K., Song, X., Sun, Z., Luo, H., & Guo, Z. (2018). Localization based on MAP and PSO for drifting-restricted underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors, 19(1), 71.
  23. 23.
    Saeed, N., Celik, A., Alouini, M. S., & Al-Naffouri, T. Y. (2020). Analysis of 3D localization in underwater optical wireless networks with uncertain anchor positions. Science China Information Sciences, 63, 1-8.
  24. 24.
    Shams, R., Khan, F. H., Amir, M., Otero, P., & Poncela, J. (2021). Critical analysis of localization and time synchronization algorithms in underwater wireless sensor networks: issues and challenges. Wireless Personal Communications, 116, 1231-1258.
  25. 25.
    Beniwal, M., & Singh, R. (2014). Localization techniques and their challenges in underwater wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol, 5(3), 4706-4710.
  26. 26.
    Nemer, I., Sheltami, T., Shakshuki, E., Elkhail, A. A., & Adam, M. (2021). Performance evaluation of range-free localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 25(1), 177-203.
  27. 27.
    Patel, Z. D., & Rana, K. (2018, May). A review on time synchronization free localization schemes in underwater wireless sensor networks. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) (pp. 330-335). IEEE.
  28. 28.
    Lee, K. H., Yu, C. H., Choi, J. W., & Seo, Y. B. (2008, August). ToA based sensor localization in underwater wireless sensor networks. In 2008 SICE annual conference (pp. 1357-1361). IEEE.
  29. 29.
    Benmessahel, I., Xie, K., & Chellal, M. (2020). A new competitive multiverse optimization technique for solving single?objective and multiobjective problems. Engineering Reports, 2(3), e12124.
  30. 30.
    Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Hatamlou, A. (2016). Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27, 495-513.
  31. 31.
    Hao, K., Xue, Q., Li, C., & Yu, K. (2020). A hybrid localization algorithm based on Doppler shift and AOA for an underwater mobile node. IEEE Access, 8, 181662-181673.
  32. 32.
    Sayed, G. I., Darwish, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2018). A new chaotic multi-verse optimization algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30(2), 293-317.
  33. 33.
    Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., Heidari, A. A., Faris, H., &Mirjalili, S. (2020). Multi-verse optimizer: theory, literature review, and application in data clustering. Nature-inspired optimizers: theories, literature reviews and applications, 123-141.
  34. 34.
    Ojha, T., Misra, S., & Obaidat, M. S. (2020). SEAL: Self-adaptive AUV-based localization for sparsely deployed Underwater Sensor Networks. Computer Communications, 154, 204-215.