International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

PPFedSL: Privacy Preserving Split and Federated Learning Enabled Secure Data Sharing Model for Internet of Vehicles in Smart City

Author NameAuthor Details

Komala Soares, Arundhati A. Shinde, Mangal Patil

Komala Soares[1]

Arundhati A. Shinde[2]

Mangal Patil[3]

[1] Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Dhankawadi, Pune, India.

[2]Electronics and Communication Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune, India.

[3]Electronics and Communication Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Engineering, Pune, India.

Abstract

Recently, the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) technology has played a pivotal role in enhancing transportation efficiency and safety. In this context, high-density vehicles generate more sensitive heterogeneous data, increasing privacy concerns in secure IoV data sharing. Federated Learning (FL) and Split Learning (SL) are trending paradigms of collaborative learning that facilitate potential solutions to privacy and heterogeneous data concerns. Thus, developing a privacy-preserving collaborative learning strategy is crucial for improving performance. This paper introduces a novel Privacy-Preserving Federated and Adaptive Split Learning (PPFedSL) strategy, enabling secure and efficient data sharing for IoV in smart city environments. This model integrates adaptive SL and FL by establishing a dual-tier privacy-preserved data-sharing strategy. Exploiting lightweight and hybrid cryptographic algorithms across different tiers ensures security and efficiency in data sharing across edge and cloud infrastructures without imposing significant computational overhead. This approach has designed two phases: privacy-preserving SL-enabled vehicle-edge collaboration and privacy-preserving FL-enabled edge-cloud collaboration. The proposed strategy effectively addresses latency constraints by delegating emergency decision-making at the edge level, where data is processed close to the IoV devices. Edges can inspect and respond to pressing data streams in real-time and guarantee timely interventions for latency-sensitive traffic management and collision avoidance scenarios. Finally, the experimental results demonstrate the efficiency of this proposed PPFedSL. The PPFedSL enhances the robustness efficiency by 93.2% and learning accuracy by 98.4% with high privacy preservation and heterogeneous data handling.

Index Terms

Smart City

Internet of Vehicles (IoVs)

Split Learning (SL)

Federated Learning (FL)

Dual-tier Security

Privacy Preservation

Cryptography Primitives

Secure Collaborative Data Sharing

Reference

  1. 1.
    B. Ji, X. Zhang, S. Mumtaz, C. Han, C. Li, H. Wen, and D. Wang, “Survey on the internet of vehicles: Network architectures and applications,” IEEE Commun. Standards Mag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2020.
  2. 2.
    W. Duan, J. Gu, M. Wen, G. Zhang, Y. Ji, and S. Mumtaz, “Emerging technologies for 5G-IoV networks: applications, trends and opportunities,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 283–289, 2020.
  3. 3.
    S. M. Karim, A. Habbal, S. A. Chaudhry, and A. Irshad, “Architecture, protocols, and security in IoV: Taxonomy, analysis, challenges, and solutions,” Security and Commun. Networks, vol. 2022, 2022.
  4. 4.
    H. Taslimasa, S. Dadkhah, E. C. P. Neto, P. Xiong, S. Ray, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Security issues in Internet of Vehicles (IoV): A comprehensive survey,” Internet of Things, vol. 100809, 2023.
  5. 5.
    X. Xu, H. Li, W. Xu, Z. Liu, L. Yao, and F. Dai, “Artificial intelligence for edge service optimization in internet of vehicles: A survey,” Tsinghua Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 270–287, 2021.
  6. 6.
    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, and H. V. Poor, “Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1622–1658, 2021.
  7. 7.
    Z. Du, C. Wu, T. Yoshinaga, K. L. A. Yau, Y. Ji, and J. Li, “Federated learning for vehicular internet of things: Recent advances and open issues,” IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc., vol. 1, pp. 45–61, 2020.
  8. 8.
    V. P. Chellapandi, L. Yuan, C. G. Brinton, S. H. ?ak, and Z. Wang, “Federated learning for connected and automated vehicles: A survey of existing approaches and challenges,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Vehicles, 2023.
  9. 9.
    Y. Bao, W. Qiu, X. Cheng, and J. Sun, “Fine-grained data sharing with enhanced privacy protection and dynamic users group service for the IoV,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2022.
  10. 10.
    U. Bodkhe and S. Tanwar, “P2IOV: Privacy preserving lightweight secure data dissemination scheme for internet of vehicles,” in 2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  11. 11.
    M. Jamjoom, H. Abulkasim, and S. Abbas, “Lightweight authenticated privacy-preserving secure framework for the Internet of vehicles,” Security and Commun. Networks, vol. 2022, 2022.
  12. 12.
    D. M. Manias and A. Shami, “Making a case for federated learning in the internet of vehicles and intelligent transportation systems,” IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 88–94, 2021.
  13. 13.
    X. Zhou, W. Liang, J. She, Z. Yan, I. Kevin, and K. Wang, “Two-layer federated learning with heterogeneous model aggregation for 6G supported internet of vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 5308–5317, 2021.
  14. 14.
    Y. Lu, X. Huang, Y. Dai, S. Maharjan, and Y. Zhang, “Federated learning for data privacy preservation in vehicular cyber-physical systems,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 50–56, May/Jun. 2020.
  15. 15.
    P. Zhao, Y. Huang, J. Gao, L. Xing, H. Wu, and H. Ma, “Federated learning based collaborative authentication protocol for shared data in social IoV,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 7385–7398, Apr. 2022.
  16. 16.
    X. Yuan et al., “A federated bidirectional connection broad learning scheme for secure data sharing in internet of vehicles,” China Commun., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 117–133, Jul. 2021.
  17. 17.
    X. Li, L. Cheng, C. Sun, K. Y. Lam, X. Wang, and F. Li, “Federated learning-empowered collaborative data sharing for vehicular edge networks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 116–124, May/Jun. 2021.
  18. 18.
    M. Gawas, H. Patil, and S. S. Govekar, “An integrative approach for secure data sharing in vehicular edge computing using blockchain,” Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., vol. 14, pp. 1–18, 2021.
  19. 19.
    M. Nakanoya, J. Im, H. Qiu, S. Katti, M. Pavone, and S. Chinchali, “Personalized federated learning of driver prediction models for autonomous driving,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00956, 2021.
  20. 20.
    D. Su, Y. Zhou, and L. Cui, “Boost decentralized federated learning in vehicular networks by diversifying data sources,” in 2022 IEEE 30th Int. Conf. Network Protocols (ICNP), 2022, pp. 1–11.
  21. 21.
    A. Shamsian, A. Navon, E. Fetaya, and G. Chechik, “Personalized federated learning using hypernetworks,” in Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 2021, pp. 9489–9502.
  22. 22.
    W. Y. B. Lim, J. Huang, Z. Xiong, J. Kang, D. Niyato, X. S. Hua, and C. Miao, “Towards federated learning in UAV-enabled internet of vehicles: A multi-dimensional contract-matching approach,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5140–5154, 2021.
  23. 23.
    X. Yuan, J. Chen, N. Zhang, C. Zhu, Q. Ye, and X. S. Shen, “FedTSE: Low-cost federated learning for privacy-preserved traffic state estimation in IoV,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2022-IEEE Conf. on Computer Commun. Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2022, pp. 1–6.
  24. 24.
    H. K. Hangdong, M. Bo, D. H. Darong, and Z. D. Zhaoyang, “FedVPS: Federated learning for privacy and security of internet of vehicles on non-IID data,” in 2023 IEEE 12th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conf. (DDCLS), 2023, pp. 178–183.
  25. 25.
    F. Liang, Q. Yang, R. Liu, J. Wang, K. Sato, and J. Guo, “Semi-synchronous federated learning protocol with dynamic aggregation in internet of vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 4677–4691, 2022.
  26. 26.
    Y. Wang, L. Xiong, X. Niu, Y. Wang, and D. Liang, “A federated learning-based privacy-preserving data sharing scheme for internet of vehicles,” in Int. Conf. on Frontiers in Cyber Security, Singapore, 2022, pp. 18–33.
  27. 27.
    W. Jin, Y. Yao, S. Han, C. Joe-Wong, S. Ravi, S. Avestimehr, and C. He, “FedML-HE: An efficient homomorphic-encryption-based privacy-preserving federated learning system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10837, 2023.
  28. 28.
    C. Fang, Y. Guo, Y. Hu, B. Ma, L. Feng, and A. Yin, “Privacy-preserving and communication-efficient federated learning in internet of things,” Comput. & Security, vol. 103, p. 102199, 2021.
  29. 29.
    R. Parekh, N. Patel, R. Gupta, N. K. Jadav, S. Tanwar, A. Alharbi, and M. S. Raboaca, “GEFL: Gradient encryption-aided privacy-preserved federated learning for autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 1825–1839, 2023.
  30. 30.
    P. Agbaje, A. Anjum, A. Mitra, S. Hounsinou, E. Nwafor, and H. Olufowobi, “Privacy-preserving intrusion detection system for internet of vehicles using split learning,” in Proc. IEEE/ACM 10th Int. Conf. on Big Data Computing, Applications and Technologies, 2023, pp. 1–8.
  31. 31.
    M. Wu, G. Cheng, D. Ye, J. Kang, R. Yu, Y. Wu, and M. Pan, “Federated split learning with data and label privacy preservation in vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2023.
  32. 32.
    A. Padaria, A. A. Mehta, N. K. Jadav, S. Tanwar, D. Garg, A. Singh, and G. Sharma, “Traffic sign classification for autonomous vehicles using split and federated learning underlying 5G,” IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol., 2023.
  33. 33.
    M. Wu, G. Cheng, D. Ye, J. Kang, R. Yu, Y. Wu, and M. Pan, “Federated split learning with data and label privacy preservation in vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2023.
  34. 34.
    X. Qiang, Z. Chang, C. Ye, T. Hamalainen, and G. Min, “Split federated learning empowered vehicular edge intelligence: Adaptive parallel design and future directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15804, 2024.
  35. 35.
    X. Qiang, Z. Chang, Y. Hu, L. Liu, and T. Hämäläinen, “Adaptive and parallel split federated learning in vehicular edge computing,” IEEE Internet Things J., 2024.
  36. 36.
    Y. Zhao, J. Zhao, M. Yang, T. Wang, N. Wang, L. Lyu, and K. Y. Lam, “Local differential privacy-based federated learning for internet of things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 8836–8853, 2020.
  37. 37.
    K. S. Patil, I. Mandal, and C. Rangaswamy, “Hybrid and adaptive cryptographic-based secure authentication approach in IoT-based applications using hybrid encryption,” Pervasive Mobile Comput., vol. 82, p. 101552, 2022.
  38. 38.
    BITVehicle. Kaggle: Your Machine Learning and Data Science Community. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kuanghangdong/bitvehicle .