International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA)

Published By EverScience Publications

ISSN : 2395-0455

Analysis of VBF protocol in Underwater Sensor Network for Static and Moving Nodes

Author NameAuthor Details

C. Namesh, B. Ramakrishnan

C. Namesh[1]

B. Ramakrishnan[2]

[1]Department of Computer Science, S.T. Hindu College, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India.

[2]Department of Computer Science and Research Centre, S.T. Hindu College, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India.


Underwater acoustic sensor network is used to monitor the ocean areas with the help of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, wireless data access points like tools. A number of problems like environmental changes, predicting disaster informations, exploration of mines can be addressed by applying this process in the sea. In this paper, we apply the routing protocol Vector Based Forwarding in two different architecture like static nodes and moving nodes in an underwater architecture. The comparison between the architecture is based on the simulation results, from the comparison the Energy Efficiency, Throughput, PDR are analyzed. Seeing the various graph results, we can conclude that the VBF protocol is significantly beneficial for the underwater architecture with moving nodes than static nodes.

Index Terms



Vector Based Forwarding




  1. 1.
    J Heidemann, W Ye, J Wills, A Syed, Y Li, Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking. Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '06), Las Vegas, Nev, USA 1, April 2006, pp.228–235.
  2. 2.
    J-H Cui, J Kong, M Gerla, S Zhou, The challenges of building scalable mobile underwater wireless sensor networks for aquatic applications. IEEE Network 20(3), 2006, pp.12–18.
  3. 3.
    JG Proakis, JA Rice, EM Sozer, M Stojanovic, Shallow water acoustic networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 39(11), 2001, pp.114–119.
  4. 4.
    Abdul Wahid, Kim Dongkyun- Analyzing Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks -International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS)- Vol. 2, No. 3, December 2010.
  5. 5.
    B.Ramakrishnan, RS.Rajesh, RS. Shaji, Analysis of routing protocols for highway model without using roadside unit and cluster, IJSER, Vol 2 issue 1,2011,pp. 1-9.
  6. 6.
    A Goel, AG Kannan, I Katz, R Bartos, Improving efficiency of a flooding-based routing protocol for underwater networks. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks, San Francisco, Calif, USA, pp.91–94, September 2008.
  7. 7.
    S. Ahmed, I. U. Khan, M. B. Rasheed, M. Ilahi, R. D. Khaz, S. H. Bouk, N. Javaid “Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols for Under Water Wireless Sensor Networks”-COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  8. 8.
    John Heidemann, Milica Stojanovic, Michele Zorzi –“Underwater Sensor Networks: Applications, Advances, and Challenges”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, August 2011.
  9. 9.
    J Kong, J-H Cui, D Wu, M Gerla, Building underwater adhoc networks for large scale real-time aquatic applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Military Communication Conference (MILCOM '05), 2005.
  10. 10.
    Peng Xie and Jun-Hong Cui and Li Lao-“VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks” – IFIP Networking, pp.1216-1221, Springer-2006.
  11. 11.
    Y Zhang, L Cheng, A distributed protocol for multi-hop underwater robot positioning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, August 2004.
  12. 12.
    E. A. Carlson, P. P. Beaujean, “Location aware routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks,” Oceans 2006.
  13. 13.
    NH Kussat, CD Chadwell, R Zimmerman, Absolute positioning of an autonomous underwater vehicle using GPS and acoustic measurements. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 30(1), pp. 153–164, 2005.
  14. 14.
    Z Zhou, J-H Cui, A Bagtzoglou, Scalable localization with mobility prediction for underwater sensor networks. UCONN CSE Report, July 2007.
  15. 15.
    B.Ramakrishnan, RS.Rajesh, RS. Shaji, CBVNET: A cluster based vehicular adhoc network model for simple highway communication, IJANA vol 2, issue 4, pp. 755-761, 2011.
  16. 16.
    B.Ramakrishnan, MM.Jeo, RB. Nishanth, Modeling and simulation of efficient cluster based Manhattan Mobility model for Vehicular communication, IJANA vol 6, issue 2, pp.253-261, 2014.
  17. 17.
    A.Anumba Merlyn, A.Anuja Merlyn, “Energy Efficient Routing (EER) For Reducing Congestion and Time Delay in Wireless Sensor Network”, Internatonal Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), Volume - 1, Issue - , Page. No : 1-10, November – December (2014).
  18. 18.
    Mari Carmen Domingo, Rui Prior, Energy analysis or routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks, Elsevier Computer communication 2008, pp.1227-1237.
  19. 19.
    Ming Xu, Guangzhong Liu, Daqi Zhu , A Cluster-Based secure synchronization protocol for Underwater wireless sensor Network, Hindawi, April 2014.
  20. 20.
    P.Casari, S.Marella and M zorzi ,A comparison of multiple access techniques in clustered underwater acoustic Network” , IEEE Oceans07, Aberdeen, Scotland 2007.
  21. 21.
    Mehmet C Vuran, Ian F. Akyildiz, cross-layer packet size optimization for wireless terrestrial, underwater and underground sensor networks, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 pp 780-788.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.